There are many different subgenres of fantasy fiction, but
in my experience, one of the major divisions is whether the stories take place
in something that is recognizably our own world, or a secondary (made up)
world. Real-world fantasy can take place in contemporary settings (as do most
works of urban fantasy), historic settings or mythic settings (like Arthurian
Britain or Olympian Greece), and of course different writers embrace these
settings with different degrees of historic rigor or realism. There are also
portal worlds, which are secondary but connected to our own in some way (as the Chronicles of Narnia) and
"Wainscot" worlds, where a hidden magical society with its own rules
is tucked away, hidden from the perceptions of the non magical (The Harry
Potter books and Neil Gaiman's Neverwhere are examples of this).
But for many readers, the epitome of fantasy lies in
secondary worlds that are not connected to our own. In these tales, the
protagonists are born, live and die with no knowledge of the Earth and its
history or gods. When I decided I wanted to get serious about fantasy writing a
few years ago, it never occurred to me to write anything else. Many of my
favorite fantasy novels were of this type, and the concept of making up my own
world, with its own history, culture and rules was too exciting to pass up.
My current projects take place in a secondary world. The
task creating a fleshed-out and internally consistent world with cultures,
geography, religions, government, magic systems, ecology and technology that
don't feel like they were drawn randomly from an epic fantasy hat is harder than it looks, however.
As I try to polish my first novel for submission and smooth out the rough
edges, I'm having a lot of those "if I only knew such and such when I
started" moments.
One thing I've been thinking about lately is where my world
actually came from. I'm not a fan of the old convention of writing a long,
info-dumpy prologue that details the origins and history of my world. I also
don't like those long "omniscient" outtakes that some writers insert
into narrative. My story is written in limited third, and I'm being strict with
it in that I'm not telling or showing the reader anything my pov characters
don't know or wouldn't think.
But this doesn't mean that I shouldn't know why things are the way they are. Even if my
characters have no idea about their world's true history, or even have wrong
assumptions about it, the nature of their world will shape their views and
perceptions in some way. And there will be little hints about the origins and
history of their world in various aspects of its biology and geography.
I've been thinking about the different ways a world can (in
a fantasy sense) come to exist, and I've come up with three broad categories.
1. A naturalistic or evolved world like our own. Such a
world (if reasonably Earthlike) would be billions of years old and would have a
history of complex life that goes back hundreds of millions of years. There may
be magic and gods and fantastic creatures or beings, but they're aspects of
this natural world. If a god or gods created it, they'd be like the deist's
god--setting things up at the beginning and letting them run according to the
rules. Perhaps the gods even evolve and change with the world. The people who
live in the world may well be unaware of its true nature (just as we were
unaware of the true nature of our own for much of its history, and indeed, many
still are). They may believe in gods that don't exist, or completely
misunderstand the god or gods that do exist.
There are certain things that one expects to see in an
evolved world: fossils and fossil fuels (like coal), homologies between the
body parts of different types of organism, sensible biogeographical distribution
of plants and animals, ethnicities and cultures that fit in with what we
understand about the effects of biogeography on human micro-evolution. Of
course, if your world isn't very much like Earth, things can get interesting
here. But in general, the author might approach things more the way a science
fiction writer might, though the presence of magic and interactive gods does
make it possible for some bizarre incongruities to exist (say dragons exist and
were created by a long-ago wizard as a bioweapon).
2. A created world. This is a world where the reality is as
many myths and legends from our own history have asserted--there is a god or
gods who made the world, probably just a few thousand years ago, though it
could be older, and it hasn't changed much since (barring god-created or
magical cataclysms). The world doesn't "have" to be made by gods, of
course. It could be the creation of technology or magic wielded by mortals. But
it's implicit somehow that there really is a creator and that humans (and other
intelligent and non-intelligent species) have been around in pretty much their
present form all along.
While the people in an evolved world might believe they live
in a created world, there will be some things one with a more scientific mind
set might expect to see in a created world that would not be present in a
naturalistic one. Most notably, there would be matters of geography, species
distribution and homologies between different kinds of creatures (fantastic and
otherwise). In a created world, there's no reason why fantastic creatures would
need to have internal structures that made it clear they evolved from the same
ancestors as other animals with backbones. There is also no need for there to
be fossils, there likely wouldn't be coal or petroleum (although the gods might
have something analogous that they gifted people with) and so on.
3. An invaded world. In essence a portal world where someone
or something came from somewhere else in the recent or distant past and either
mostly supplanted the original denizens of either an evolved or created world,
or are a thorn in the side of said denizens. This can be the "real"
reason there are mixtures of fantastic and mundane creatures and beings where
some seem to follow predicable evolutionary patterns and others don't. This is
a portal world, maybe, where the portal is now closed or vanished.
I think most traditional fantasy falls into the second
category. A god or gods *really* did create the world, and this reality is
reflected in the beliefs of at least one group of people on the world (though possible
through a glass, darkly). Tolkien's and Lewis's worlds are certainly like this,
and it was strongly implied that Earthsea was (Ged knew that Segoy raised the
islands from the sea and created the dragons first, though we never learn how
Ged knew this).
Often it's not completely clear which of these models the
author had in mind, unless some unambiguous "truth" is revealed to the characters. In fantasy, it's not necessary to really understand all the whys
and wherefores. Indeed, trying to drop them into a story can be klunky or heavy handed. As a
reader, I don't know why George RR Martin's world, for instance, has its
strange seasonal cycle (though I've wondered if it's because it has a really bizarre axial
wobble paired with a very active and varied sunspot cycle). I don't really need to know why to enjoy the story.
However, if you know the reason for things being the way
they are, you can incorporate this knowledge in ways that will make your world
building more internally consistent. Even if my readers (and characters) never know for sure where their world came from, I do.
Happy Longest Night to everyone, and I hope everyone has a
wonderful Christmas (or Yuletide, or Solstice, or winter holiday).
Great rundown of types of world, although you missed out the far-future world of the Dying Earth genre.
ReplyDeleteI usually tend to go for the naturalistic origin, although I sometimes have fun with gods. I have a number of gods who THINK they created the world, even though other gods also think they did it in completely different ways. The humans don't have a clue - at least till they reach a roughly twentieth-century level of progress.
Anyway, thanks, and Happy Christmas (or whatever you celebrate).
Oh you're right, though that could be seen as a variant of "real world" fantasy, I suppose, assuming the far-future world is our own. Ken Scholl's world is of this nature.
ReplyDelete.